Title_logo.GIF (10450 bytes)

Home
Up 1 Level
Contents
Search

N- Soil Acidification

Nitrogen Source - Soil Acidification Remediation Trial

Roland D. Meyer
Extension Soil Specialist, UC Davis

 Drip irrigation involves having a relative small volume of soil being used as the reservoir for water and nutrient uptake by the tree. Urea and other ammonium based nitrogen sources acidify the soil rather rapidly, particularly under the emitter. This usually increases the plant uptake of manganese and aluminum, perhaps to excess concentrations. Calcium nitrate has several advantages, supplying the nitrogen in the nitrate form results in little or no soil acidification and the addition of calcium helps to neutralize any acidity. Acid fertilizers like the urea-sulfuric "N-phuric" material that are utilized to clean out the drip lines offer even greater acidification potential than urea alone. Once the soil has been acidified, particularly to the depth of several feet, remediation of the zone of low pH becomes rather difficult.

 

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the effect of different nitrogen fertilizer sources on almond meat yields, tree growth, and leaf nutrient concentrations of nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, manganese and boron, and (2) To evaluate the effect of different soil acidification remediation treatments on almond meat yields, tree growth, and leaf nutrient concentrations of nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, manganese and boron.

 

Results

The list of treatments and yield data for 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 are given in Table 1. Meat yields for 1995 showed no consistent differences due to fertilizer or soil amendment treatments. Meat yields for 1996, 1997 and 1998 were not significantly different, indicating that the acidification of the soil by different nitrogen sources and the subsequent soil amendment treatments are not having a major impact upon meat yields.

In most years and sample dates leaf nitrogen concentrations are lower for the calcium nitrate, urea-calcium nitrate alternated (which receives calcium nitrate in the odd years, 1995, 1997) and UN 32 treatments than the other nitrogen fertilizer sources. Apparently the nitrate form of nitrogen fertilizer has been denitrified in the saturated drip zone resulting in less uptake by the trees. Leaf manganese concentrations were lower on all sample dates if calcium nitrate was the nitrogen source applied. Even if calcium nitrate was applied in alternate years with urea the leaf manganese concentrations were often lower than urea-N sources. The concentrations recorded for the N-phuric treatment of nearly 700 ppm would be considered to be high but still somewhat below the expected toxic range of 1000 ppm or more. No changes have been observed from the soil amendment treatments. Soil samples were taken in early December 1998 and will be analyzed to evaluate the changes in soil pH and other characteristics from the drip emitter areas where the different nitrogen fertilizer sources and soil amendment treatments have been applied.

Plans are to continue this experiment for several more years to measure both the short term (1-2 year) and long term (4-5 year) effects of nitrogen fertilizer source and soil pH remediation treatments upon almond yields, leaf nitrogen, manganese and other nutrient concentrations as well as soil characteristics such as pH, exchangeable calcium, potassium, sodium, manganese and aluminum.

Lime and gypsum treatments (#4, 5 and 7) were applied on April 12, 1995 by making the drip emitter basins slightly deeper and placing the lime or gypsum into the basin. The lime application for treatment #6 was mixed with a small volume of soil by placing a 10" diameter PVC cylinder (18" height) over the basin hole and adding lime as an auger (8" diameter) went down to a depth of 18". When the auger was lifted out of the hole, the lime-soil mixture fell back into the hole and was packed down to form a basin again.

A total of one pound of nitrogen per tree (202 lbs N/A) from the different sources was split into thirds and applied the first week in April, May and July of 1996, 1997 and 1998. The NaK(NO3)2 + gypsum treatment was applied as a 1:1:1 Na:K:Ca ratio beginning with the second application on June 15, 1995.

 

Table 1.

Almond meat yields in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 for the nitrogen source trial at the Nickels Soil Laboratory near Arbuckle, California.

 

 

 

Treatment

1995 Yield,

(meat lbs/A)*

1996 Yield,

(meat lbs/A)

1997 Yield,

(meat lbs/A)

1998 Yield,

(meat lbs/A)

1. Calcium Nitrate 1943 ab

1963

2417

1223

2. Urea 2532 ab

2104

2303

1481

3. UN 32 2292 ab

2157

2261

1387

4. Urea - lime-0.6 lb/basin 2133 ab

2125

2422

1267

5. Urea - lime-1.2 lb/basin 2086 ab

2231

2233

1171

6. Urea - lime-3.6 lb/basin 1815 b

2094

2396

1537

7. Urea - gypsum 2291 ab

2099

2451

1057

8. Urea - NaK(NO3)2+gypsum 2694 a

2245

2863

1261

9. Calcium Nitrate – Urea** 2292 ab

2597

2600

1599

10. N-phuric 2319 ab

1952

2174

1213

LSD0.05 731

NS

NS

NS

 

*Values followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Prob <0.05).

**Calcium nitrate is applied in the odd years (1995, 1997) and urea is applied in the even years (1996, 1998).

 

 

Back Home Up 1 Level

Send mail to jlschmierer@ucdavis.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1999 Colusa County Cooperative Extension, Univ. of California
Last modified: September 01, 2000